With such strict controls under US standards, who exactly is benefiting from this?
Thread Content
I can no longer live as I did just a few years ago; lately, I’ve been constantly worried about meeting American standards. A standard is meant for reference, right? If national standards can be downloaded, then who benefits from not allowing downloads of American standards? If the US standard requires copyright, does that mean the national standard doesn’t require it? The key issue is that it’s difficult to find channels for purchasing many US-standard products. . .
Copyright protection is the main consideration, aimed at preventing the United States from attacking China on the grounds of inadequate protection of intellectual property rights. In fact, many Chinese standards are formulated with reference to American standards; by checking the original standards, one can see what it says in its original form, thereby avoiding inaccurate translations. As for who got fatter? I’m not sure whether this refers to product sales or standard paid downloads. If it’s about product sales, since American-standard products are hard to obtain, domestic alternatives can be used, which can help improve the quality of domestic products. If one must purchase foreign products, there are many agents available; large companies have branches or agents in China.
It shows that the United States is still the leader, and everything follows America’s lead. When China becomes the leader, then national standards will be in high demand!
Previously, the national standard required a fee, but now it’s free, so...