HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Discussion on Issues in HAZOP Analysis Results

2019-04-07View Original

Thread Content

As the title suggests, how can the issue of numerous sequential action valves at the control points on the main pipe, resulting from HAZOP analysis, along with their high failure probability and the difficulty in meeting SIL requirements, be resolved? Is it necessary to carry out technical modifications to the facility by addressing the issues identified in the HAZOP analysis?
Reply #22019-04-08
No, it also depends on whether you can accept the risks associated with that probability. Additionally, the reliability of the instruments varies as well
Reply #32019-04-08
It’s not necessarily the case; you can choose valves with a higher SIL rating to reduce the probability of failure and ensure that the verification is successful. If you’re reluctant to spend this money, then carry out the technical upgrades according to the recommendations put forward by HAZOP.
Reply #42019-04-09
Are all your interlocked valves connected to the SIS system? If there are many, it’s likely due to an unreasonable design, as this leads to a high failure probability. Raising the SIL level isn’t the best solution; it seems like trying to quench thirst by drinking poison.
Reply #52019-04-09
The second floor is the correct answer. But since an analysis has been done, why ask whether corrective actions will be taken or not? If no corrective actions are taken, then what’s the point of doing it?
Reply #62019-04-13
I don’t understand why the SIL level needs to be determined using HAZOP. HAZOP can recommend adopting SIS to control risks. However, the SIS level depends on the complexity of the scenario. Determined via LOPA.
Reply #72019-04-13
Please contact me if HAZOP/LOPA/SIS are required.
Reply #82019-04-15
There are too many interlocks in charge, and there is a concern about accidental operations; the interlock signals can be changed to 2oo1 or 3oo1 to reduce the impact of instrument and valve failures
Reply #92019-04-17
Choose 1 out of 2 – the probability of failure increases, right?
Reply #102019-04-18
Selecting one out of two signals enhances safety but reduces availability, increasing the probability of incorrect shutdowns. If 2-out-of-2 actuators are used for valve control, with series connection at the inlet and parallel connection for drainage, the activation of a single valve can put the process facility into or maintain it in a safe state
Reply #112019-04-18
Do HAZOP first, then LOPA

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.