Delete

I guess you’re from a university’s chemical engineering department, where you’ve researched some technologies in the lab and now want to turn them into a commercial project. So I’m looking for a design firm to turn the design into a practical implementation, to convert your core technologies into actionable design drawings. But to be honest, many of the issues mentioned above are very naive, unprofessional (not your field of expertise either), and based on assumptions. For those who provide process packages, there are \"Detailed Requirements for Process Packages\"; for those engaged in design, there are \"Basic Design Requirements\" and \"Detailed Design Requirements\". Regarding fees, there are \"Fee Regulations\", and for investment projects, there is an entire set of evaluation regulations. It’s impossible to explain everything in just a few words – professional tasks should indeed be handled by professionals. People like you would be more professional and efficient in a research institution.

https://bbs.hcbbs.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1081764&highlight=%BB%AF%B9%A4%BD%A8%C9%E8%CF%EE%C4%BF%C9%F3%C5%FA%C1%F7%B3%CC

This post was last edited by The wise on 2019-7-17 at 20:06. Additionally, investment projects are very different from the process plans in laboratories (which are not yet at the level of complete process packages); as the saying goes, \"even a small sparrow has all the essential organs.\" Having a heart and a brain isn’t enough to achieve overall coordination. There are many other issues to consider, such as: has the material balance for the entire plant been taken into account, as well as the fuel and energy balance for the whole plant? How are the utility systems (water, electricity, gas, air, nitrogen) and auxiliary production facilities integrated? What is the design scale of the utility project? How are design solutions for energy conservation and emission reduction, environmental protection, safety, and occupational health taken into account? What are the principles of general layout? What are the interface requirements for off-site facilities? Are the design foundations such as meteorological conditions, geological conditions, design parameters for utility systems, and specifications for raw materials and auxiliary materials complete? What level of design does the factory as a whole achieve? Has a feasibility study report for the project been prepared? Have the environmental impact assessment, safety assessment, and energy assessment been carried out? ........, there is still a great deal of work to be done before the project can actually be put into practice. . . I suggest that you find some professionals to establish a team for the initial preparation of the project, and handle matters such as finding design firms and purchasing equipment later on.

From the laboratory to the process package and then to the plant project, if this were in Journey to the West, it would be the time when Tang Seng has just said goodbye to the emperor~

This post was last edited by Brave Mage on 2019-7-18 at 16:08. Thank you for your guidance, senior. Previously, there were devices capable of producing 100 tons of products per set, and in fact several companies in China already had such devices. We have all the drawings and documents from previous projects in which 100 tons were produced per year, as well as experienced technicians who have been involved in such production before. Actually, the project is quite small, as only 1,000 tons are produced per year. The process is simple, and there isn’t much equipment required. There’s no need to worry about many things in large-scale chemical manufacturing. Fine chemicals are also not sensitive to costs. We just have a new process design. The feasibility study report, environmental impact assessment, etc. can be revised based on the existing versions. Of course, after all it’s about setting up a factory, and the procedures are quite complicated – one step after another has to be followed.

We should proceed step by step, one process at a time, and move on only after approval is granted.

Work with the design institute to develop the process package in a comprehensive manner and complete the basic design. As for the equipment, it is important to conduct consultations with established domestic manufacturers to determine whether their equipment manufacturing capabilities can meet the requirements for long-term operation; the process package should be capable of supporting product production for at least three years.

This is useless. No design institute has ever developed a product like ours. Currently, the companies that produce domestically have all developed their methods on their own. The design institute can only play a role in standardization and supervision.

Then consider the industry-academia-research model; after all, you should have quite a bit of confidence within your organization, and now it’s time to scale that up.