HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Questions about Yokogawa vortex flowmeters

2017-09-15View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by Hunter1 on 2017-9-16 at 20:24. Our facility has many Yokogawa vortex flowmeters, and sometimes they experience issues with inaccurate flow measurements. Just remove it and clean it. During the cleaning process, it was found that there was a small pit inside the flow meter pipe, right below the body in question; the lower part of the body rubbed against that pit. Is the presence of impurities in this small pit related to the measurement accuracy, or is it simply a function of the fixed object being measured? Dear experts, please help take a look
Reply #22017-09-15
Yokogawa’s vortex street sensor? That crossbar in the vortex street generator is merely a mechanical device that blocks the flow of fluid in order to create vortex streets; I don’t have the actual device in front of me, so it’s difficult to be certain, but theoretically it shouldn’t have any impact.
Reply #32017-09-16
This picture is of an old watch. Pull off the rusted part shown in the image, and there will be a hole underneath
Reply #42017-09-16
The sensor is located on the vortex street generator; theoretically, impurities in the mounting holes should not have any effect. However, if such impurities cause a change in the position at which the vortex street generator is installed, then it will have an impact.
Reply #52017-09-16
I also don’t think there’s any problem; that small pit is there to secure the vortex street generator. After the body is inserted into the small pit, there is almost only a tiny gap left. Every time a problem occurs, I take the affected part apart and clean it; I also clean any small holes, and then I reinstall it. A few times, the generator was not removed for cleaning; only the inner walls of the flow meter and the generator itself were cleaned (the small pits were not cleaned). Sometimes this approach doesn’t work, and I don’t know why
Reply #62017-09-16
Because the element was removed for cleaning and then reinstalled, the relative position between the element and the inner wall of the flow meter changed. It’s possible that the positions are different from before (the installation process relies on visually determining the positions), so it’s not clear where exactly the problem lies
Reply #72017-09-16
I took a few more photos; take a look
Reply #82017-09-17
It will have an impact; you can consider installing it horizontally or try installing it upside down. Awaiting good news
Reply #92017-09-17
Isn’t that pit the result of the action of a fixed entity? Does it also have a measuring function?
Reply #102017-09-17
In my humble opinion, that small pit does not affect the measurements; however, the impurities in that pit cause a change in the position of the object, which in turn leads to variations in the number of vortices formed, resulting in measurement errors.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.