HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Factors and coefficients considered in selecting the cross-sectional area of the core wires in UPS incoming cables

2020-07-01View Original

Thread Content

I compared the cable specifications and UPS capacity from my previous projects, with the results shown below: UPS capacity, converted to active power, actual active power, type of incoming cable, length of incoming cable. Under normal circumstances, cables are selected based on the same power level. Project 1: 50KVA, 40KW, 34.6KW; cable type: 4x95+50, length: 48m; alternative cable type: 4x35+16. Project 2: 20KVA, 16KW, 12.16KW; cable type: 4x70+35, length: 28m; alternative cable type: 5x6. Project 3: 30KVA, 24KW, actual value unknown; cable type: 3x70, length: 42m; alternative cable type: 4x25+16 (in case of a five-core cable). Since all of these are AC UPS cabinets, why are their incoming cables so much larger than those used in conventional applications? What factors need to be considered when selecting the cross-sectional area of the core wires in the UPS incoming cable? What are the typical values for coefficients? Please give me some advice! Thank you! (The post I just made had the table pasted as an image; it wouldn’t display when opened, so I’ve posted this again. If the moderators see it, please delete that one. Thank you.) If other users see this, please be careful when posting as well: attach the images as attachments instead of pasting them directly, otherwise the posted content may not display properly. )
Reply #22023-11-16
This post was last edited by myface on 2023-11-16 09:30. This is a 220V supply, right? I even think the first option chosen is a bit small, but why are there five wires? Only the last one seems to be a 220V configuration. If a 380V supply is used, the first two values are indeed large, but the type of cable is not indicated here; different types and installation methods have a significant impact on the current-carrying capacity.
Reply #32024-12-12
I hope to learn more comprehensively about this knowledge area

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.