Selection of benefits and systems
Thread Content
Do companies that manage to retain employees rely on good benefits? Is it still a strict assessment system?
If there’s no money, the treatment is harsh, and it’s basically impossible to retain employees. Being wealthy and strict might help retain people.
It depends on what level of people we’re talking about.
There is no pay for working on duty, no compensatory time off, and those who work insufficient hours are subject to evaluation.
No one wants to have problems with money. Talking about so-called life without considering money is nothing but nonsense.
Reward the excellent and punish the poor; ensure clear rewards and punishments, give priority to systems, and assign the right people to the right roles!
Think about that meager income from last year – fuck it; whoever wants to do it, let them do it. If the boss wants to give orders, fine; if they want to conduct evaluations, go ahead； Think about the income you had last year; forget it, just bear with it. After all, it’s not easy to find another job either – you have to support your family!
I agree with the person above; income is the prerequisite – without it, all other evaluations are nonsense and meaningless. To make employees care about their income, rules and regulations will only work when they care about the salary you pay them. When employees don’t care about their salary, trying to control them strictly will have the opposite effect – they will resist you. So why put yourself in an awkward situation?
Most people are like this; some prioritize comfort (with everything else being less important), while others are only interested in the salary.
That’s a bit much, right? How is it possible to keep that in place?
It’s at least some income, right?:handshake