The issue of assigning costs to catalysts
Thread Content
I would like to ask everyone: should the cost of catalysts for the plant be included in the plant construction costs? There are those reasons given
The cost of catalysts for the plant is included in the plant construction costs and falls under the category of \"costs related to production and equipment acquisition.\" This includes the purchase costs of equipment that requires installation as well as those that do not, primary filling materials, catalysts, and chemicals, as well as the purchase costs of vulnerable components that must be acquired according to design and commissioning requirements and ordered along with the equipment.
I took a look at the investment estimate table; the figure for this investment estimate is quite low. It seems that what’s listed here is mainly the production workforce multiplied by a coefficient of 0.16, and it appears that something is missing.
I took a look at the investment estimate table; the figure for this investment estimate is quite low. It seems that what’s listed here is mainly the production workforce multiplied by a coefficient of 0.16, and it appears that something is missing.
Both the filler and the catalyst represent initial construction costs, while replacing them later constitutes subsequent expenses. Without a catalyst, how can testing and evaluation be carried out?
It must be included all of it. Britain is being reckless