How to resolve the conflict between production management and equipment management?

Thread Content

1. Contradictions between production management and equipment management
The contradictions between production management and equipment management are common in many manufacturing enterprises. Generally speaking, equipment management is a fundamental aspect of a company’s production and operation management, with its main goal being to serve production. Why is there a contradiction between the two? The fundamental reason is that corporate managers (including those in decision-making positions) prioritize production over equipment. Because what enterprises care about are economic benefits, and production emphasizes direct economic benefits ； As for equipment management, what stands out most is the increase in costs. It mainly highlights the following two points: 1. An equipment accident or malfunction occurs, affecting production. Everyone seems to be blaming the Technology Department for not doing their job properly. Production isn’t going well because of our equipment problems, and in terms of management we are forced to make concessions to production; everything we do is geared towards serving production. If company leaders (including employees) consistently adopt an attitude of emphasizing production over equipment, then managing equipment will certainly become much more difficult. 2. The company has not clearly defined the management tasks and responsibilities of the two departments. When there is insufficient coordination or conflicts between two departments, management loopholes may occur. Whenever a problem arises, they shift responsibility and pass the buck to each other. For example: raw material control, production volume setting, parameter modification and control, operation under defective conditions, changes to automated instruments, supervision of operators’ operating procedures, etc. Both functional departments still need to communicate and reach an understanding. Suggestions: 1. The company should instill the concept that “equipment is just as important as production”; only then will frontline employees place importance on equipment and proactively carry out its maintenance and routine inspections as required. As long as regular maintenance of the equipment is carried out, it will **reduce the occurrence of unexpected failures** and **extend the equipment’s service life**. It has inadvertently generated tremendous economic benefits for the company. 2. Company leaders should comprehensively analyze the gaps and conflicts between production management and equipment management, and clarify the supervisory tasks and responsibility assignments for relevant aspects. In particular, clear requirements are set regarding factors prone to causing equipment accidents and weak points in management. 3. Production management and equipment management must strengthen communication and coordination more closely, including coordination of work between departments, communication among managers, coordination among company leaders, as well as coordination between workshop operators and maintenance workers, etc. 2. The contradiction between extensive management and refined management
In various industries, the “refined management” model is widely adopted in equipment management. There are countless management models and theories; however, their underlying management objective is essentially to “maximize a company’s economic benefits”. In many companies, equipment management is merely \"extensive management\"; the technical department focuses on \"repairing\" rather than on \"management\". Equipment managers (including those in the technical department, workshop mechanics, inspectors, etc.) have gradually become passive and lost enthusiasm for equipment management. The work is exhausting and yields no results; as long as there are no problems, everything is fine. Most of the time at work one just has to wait passively for the equipment to break down, and when problems do occur, one has to act as a \"firefighter\" to fix them. This creates a vicious cycle that leads to even more equipment problems. Suggestions: 1. It is necessary to strengthen the ideological education of equipment management personnel, enhance their sense of responsibility and initiative, and strive to build teams that are motivated and capable, passionate about equipment, and have a correct understanding of equipment management. 2. It is possible to learn specifically by drawing on the management models of peer companies or advanced enterprises. Management is a discipline; one must not remain stagnant, and theoretical discussions or impractical ideas are to be avoided at all costs. 3. The definition of management is human-centered coordination activities aimed at achieving desired goals. Therefore, the company highlights the direct benefits of equipment management in areas such as labor protection, wage distribution, and performance evaluation, thereby boosting everyone’s enthusiasm for work. 3 The contradiction between management and being managed: As a functional department focused on equipment management, the Technical Department is responsible for the unified management and oversight of all equipment-related tasks in the workshop. 1. In terms of those being managed: The work in the Technology Department is generally varied and extensive. Most of the work is done according to the instructions given by superior leaders. When other departments encounter problems, they turn to the technical department first; the technical department also handles many tasks that have nothing to do with equipment management. It is an honor for the Technical Department to assist the company with various emergency tasks, as well as various temporary or unexpected tasks. But if the company’s current workforce structure is limited, then this approach is not very suitable. Furthermore, as the technical department focuses on its core tasks, its leadership and decision-making abilities are more or less limited to a certain extent. 2. In terms of proactive management: The Technical Department is on an equal footing with other workshops and departments; each department has its own set of value priorities. However, since the Technical Department performs service-oriented tasks, it is easily overlooked and its value is not readily apparent. In many such cases, the technical department may find itself in a somewhat awkward position. The technical department and the workshop work together to manage the equipment; as the direct managers of the equipment, the workshop oversees the daily tasks of mechanics, inspectors, and operators. For example: if a problem is detected with the equipment, it is hoped that the workshop will make corrections; yet if the workshop fails to do so in a timely manner or does not pay enough attention to it ； If equipment evaluations are strictly enforced, the relationship with the workshop will naturally become strained; such strain can lead to more problems arising. Suggestions: 1. Supervisors should make more reasonable arrangements when assigning tasks. The technical department should focus more of its efforts on equipment management and try to avoid other matters. 2. Other departments and the Technology Department should establish a common value orientation, attach importance to the work of the Technology Department, enhance its leadership and flexibility in resource allocation, and design a reasonable and effective assessment and evaluation system. 4 Factors affecting the improvement of equipment management. Equipment management is a systematic and long-term coordinating effort; it is also a tedious and cumbersome task that emphasizes a people-centered approach. Of course, in recent years, the following issues have become evident in equipment management within the Technology Department: 1. There is insufficient understanding of equipment management; motivation is low and laziness is prevalent. This is partly because employees are content with the status quo and lack a strong sense of responsibility. As a result, they lack motivation, find tasks tedious, and fear hard work. Much of the work is mainly aimed at passing inspections and completing tasks. On the other hand, since their personal value isn’t recognized, they become mentally imbalanced. Gradually, those willing to work themselves to death end up not wanting to do it anymore, and even those capable of doing the job well lose motivation. Suggestion: Strengthen education on the spirit of teamwork, and also consider implementing appropriate incentive mechanisms to boost employees’ enthusiasm. 2. The ability to solve problems needs improvement, and the professional skills possessed are not strong enough. To manage equipment effectively, it is necessary to have sufficient professional knowledge and extensive experience. Suggestion: Improve one’s own learning ability. It’s not necessary for everyone to delve into all issues, but each person must gain a deeper understanding in at least one area. In this process, the company also needs to allocate sufficient resources to transform technology into productivity. This enables the technology department to conduct in-depth research in certain technological areas, ultimately leading to certain breakthroughs and achievements. 3. The equipment management system is not yet fully developed. A equipment management system encompasses many aspects, and ignoring any of them prevents the formation of a complete system. The current status of equipment management in some companies is as follows: 1. \"Emphasis on repairs over maintenance.\" 2. Many management systems are incomplete and not implemented. 3. Basic tasks such as equipment contingency plans are not yet complete. 4. The economic benefits of spare parts management are not reflected.