Regarding inspection issues
Thread Content
The requirement is to conduct inspections every 2 hours, but it has been observed that employees check two locations in succession; for example, location 1–2 and location 3–4. The employee goes out to check the first location around 2:45, and then immediately checks the second location a few minutes after 3 o’clock. In reality, by checking both locations in one inspection trip, they effectively reduce the number of inspections needed, thus failing to meet the requirement for regular inspections at set intervals.
Cameras are available at very low prices; you can simply set up several monitoring points. For reference.
Using a inspection device, it is possible to set the interval between consecutive clock-ins to more than 1 hour.
Specific inspection times can be set, such as 15 minutes around 2 o’clock or 15 minutes around 4 o’clock
I’m not sure what you mean. Is it meant to convey the employees’ laziness, or is it intended to show that efforts should be made to solve this problem? Obviously, there is a problem with the system – there are no detailed guidelines for assigning tasks, which allows smarter employees to find loopholes. You should thank them for giving you another lesson to help fix the loopholes in the system, rather than blaming them.
Inspection signs are installed on site; inspections are carried out every 2 hours. Inspections can be conducted at the whole hours of 1, 3, 5 or 2, 4, 6, with the inspection time allowed to vary within ±10 or ±20 minutes; exceeding this range results in a penalty.
Manage people through systems; without rules, nothing can be accomplished.
Checking is not the goal; it is necessary to identify problems and ensure that inspections meet the required standards, which demands strict management
With a \"round-inspection system\" as a prerequisite, the main tasks are inspection and assessment; identify typical cases through inspections, issue notifications, and impose severe penalties!