For strengthening the heavy tower skirt base as well, is a triangular shape better or a linear shape better?
Thread Content
Which of the two tail-strengthening arrangements shown in the figure is better?
Looking at the design, they have the same functionality. The materials are pretty much the same.
It seems that the second method of production and assembly is a bit simpler
1. From a stress analysis perspective, triangular supports provide better stiffness when using support beams of the same specifications. 2. With triangular or polygonal supports, there is space available in the middle at the bottom of the tower, allowing for the installation of connections； And the middle crossbeam affects the operating space.
Yes, this is mainly related to design. Generally, for containers used abroad, the safety factor is not as high as that of those manufactured in China, and triangular reinforcement is usually employed.
There are more triangles, resulting in better overall stress distribution.
The choice between section steel and steel pipes is also made by the engineer themselves
You’re really well-informed; I’ve never come across a tower of this size before. It must be quite heavy as well!