Thread Content
If you are right, there’s no need to get angry; if you are wrong, there’s no reason to get angry
If it’s a leader, it might be to maintain their own authority
This post was last edited by CHANGBAISHI on 2019-8-25 09:14. This is a type of “shout” that depends on the situation. The manifestation of getting angry should be called “roaring” or “shouting in anger”. It is a strong external manifestation of inner feelings. This word actually has two meanings: one is a term used in traditional Chinese medicine to refer to the spleen in the human body, and the other is used to describe a person’s personality. I think it’s better to focus on figuring out how to avoid making the other person angry, rather than blaming them for your own ‘temper’. That’s what deserves careful consideration. If ancient emperors did this, do you still have the right to criticize their temper? ? ? Actually, it’s not necessary to go that far in thinking about it. If you understand the meaning of the word “command” on the battlefield, then you won’t get stuck on the concept of “temper”. A deeper understanding shows that it actually involves blaming the other party, confronting them, and even other things as well. :P
How to act so as not to make the other person angry is what deserves careful consideration. Well said
Expressing emotions \ud83d\ude02\ud83d\ude02\ud83d\ude02
Don’t get angry – do you think I’m some sick cat, or that I’m an easy target to manipulate at will? So, still need to get angry.
People sometimes act irrationally; if one can control their emotions, they certainly won’t lose their temper