Thread Content
High-quality educational resources and top students are already highly concentrated
I just want to say that this method can’t be used to create chips; it only produces machines designed for taking exams :L
It’s fine for high-quality students to gather in certain places, as that’s how people naturally behave. The education system cannot allow schools with many underperforming students to give up; the necessary hardware and software resources must be provided – that’s a fundamental requirement.
High-quality resources are used to cultivate high-quality students, thus achieving efficient utilization of those resources.
These two schools account for half of the whole province. This is not a small province, but a large one
The difficulty of the exam questions is intended to create a gap in scores, but the cost for these children to achieve high grades is also enormous. It may bury a group of people with good talent but little effort, but it also creates a group of people who are willing to work hard. It is in such an educational environment that the fittest benefit. . .
Then let’s abolish the public nine-year compulsory education system and switch to all private schools; at the same time, we should remove education from the category of expenses that are covered by taxes, so that everyone has to pay for schooling out of their own pocket.
This precisely shows that the minimum standards I mentioned have not been met; schools with many \"underperforming students\" lack everything in terms of hardware and software, which further exacerbates the polarization among students.
Some schools recruit outstanding talents from across the province starting from the seventh grade, and then conduct another screening during the middle school entrance exams. As a result, by the time of the high school entrance exams, the best candidates are already in their ranks
What’s the use of talent alone if there’s no effort?