HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Which book on physical chemistry is better? I’m a beginner

2015-06-01View Original

Thread Content

Whose ‘Physical Chemistry’ is better? I’m a beginner and want to pursue a career in chemical engineering processes. Thank you!
Reply #22015-06-01
If you want to work in process engineering, why read \"Chemical Process Engineering\", \"Reaction Engineering\", and \"Chemical Engineering Design\"? What’s the point of reading \"Physical Chemistry\"?
Reply #32015-06-01
Hu Ying, East China University of Science and Technology; Wang Zhenglie, Tianjin University
Reply #42015-06-01
Nanda Fu’s version is better in terms of color; we use the one from Tianda.
Reply #52015-06-01
I recommend two books, one in English: Peter Atkins’ Physical Chemistry 2006. The other one is the one recommended upstairs by Nan Da Fu Xiancai.
Reply #62015-06-01
I recommend the Tian Da Wang Zhenglie version; it’s relatively concise and practical.
Reply #72015-06-01
Thank you. What does concise and practical mean?
Reply #82015-06-02
Hu Ying and Fu Xiancai have a lighter shade, while Zhu Wentao and Wang Zhenglie have a darker shade.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.