Thread Content
Experts, please share your thoughts: **With safety being emphasized and checks carried out on a daily basis, why do accidents still occur frequently?**
Well, there is no absolute safety; there are too many unpredictable and uncontrollable factors
It’s similar to the fuel consumption of a car: as long as it’s running, fuel is consumed; if it’s not running, the fuel consumption per 100 kilometers is naturally zero
This year, there have been many problems at Tenglong Aromatics, Yangzi Petrochemical, Nanjing Industrial Zone, Shida Chemical Plant, Tianjin Binhai New Area, and Zibo Chemical Plant the night before last. **Efforts are being made to address these issues, but the companies keep asking: where exactly lie the problems?
Because there are too many people who are not dedicated to their work.
Collusion between regulators and enterprises leads to many problems. A lot of safety work is done in a superficial manner. It’s sad that people without technical knowledge manage chemical plants, acting so presumptuous!
How should I give an example? Just by talking about it, accidents won’t happen? ? Just check it and that’s it? There is no absolute safety; it is a relative process. . . There are too many unpredictable factors,,, and sometimes it’s the laypeople who end up in charge of the experts. . .
You can take a look at this; experts point out that China’s chemical industry faces serious layout-related risks. http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1430584-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Forum)
This question sounds like it was asked by a layperson. Anyone who has been in this field for a few years knows that no one can claim that a place they have investigated is safe – that’s common sense.
It’s the details – many details that aren’t given much attention are actually the cause of explosions. This is due to negligence; after all, there are so many things in a chemical plant and the number of staff is limited, so it’s impossible for everyone to keep an eye on the equipment without doing any other work
Weak safety awareness and improper operations, inadequate supervision by regulatory departments..............