The E+H radar level gauge provides inaccurate level readings
Thread Content
The E+H radar level gauge we purchased last year started giving problems when it was put into use this year; the liquid level in the gas holder was not displayed accurately, while the DCS showed a value of 18.3 meters. The actual liquid level is only 3 meters; there is no on-site display, nor is there a manual controller to operate it! ! ! Urgent
First, clean the probe by yourself; if the problem persists, it is likely a parameter setting issue, and you should consult E+H’s after-sales service team for help.
You can consult E+H’s after-sales staff; a BJZT-II multi-point average temperature sensor can also be used with radar level gauges – it offers high accuracy and is easy to install. It’s better to try it out first before putting it into use in the future, even though E+H is very well-known.
The radar is installed on the top of the rubber-membrane gas holder, at a height of 30 meters.
We have contacted the staff at E+H’s Shandong office; a request for on-site service has been submitted and we are awaiting a response.
I think it’s better to hurry and try to fix it before the manufacturer arrives; it’s not right anyway, and maybe you can get it fixed properly. Don’t try to do it by yourself. Next time it breaks down, you still won’t know how to fix it. The E+H one is quite useful. Set the empty mark and full mark according to the actual settings. Set the range and dead zone. The dielectric constant has been set. If the operating conditions are stable, it should work. Another issue is your installation problem. The probe should not be installed too close to the feed inlet. Or there might be baffles or something in your device that needs to be avoided. If the installation is successful and the settings are good, implement echo suppression. It should be fine. I think you should implement can suppression when your device is empty. There should be no major issues with putting it into use. . It’s just my personal opinion; choose what to watch
It’s the radar level gauge causing trouble again, sigh
Agree 1111111; that crazy guy before really messed me up. Now I use differential pressure transmitters for the fuel tanks – no need to worry about them for two years, which is convenient
There is a relatively strong interference at 18.3 meters; you can try to implement suppression at that location!
Calibration, right? Any changes in the installation? Was wave interference checked? Wait, find the manufacturer last