HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

ASPEN simulation of parameter problems for pressure-swapped distillation of acetonitrile-water

2015-09-10View Original

Thread Content

ASPEN was used to simulate pressure-swapped distillation of acetonitrile-water, with a ratio of 0.6 for acetonitrile and 0.4 for water. In one example, the D/F value for the vacuum distillation column was set to 0.9; the simulation converged easily, but the diameter of the distillation column turned out to be too large. Later, different D/F values were tried; some led to convergence while others did not. How is the value of this D/F determined? Because different D/F values correspond to different circulation rates, the diameter of the distillation column varies significantly. Additionally, when calculated separately, it converges; however, including sensitivity analysis leads to errors in the obtained values ; Or the values in the sensitivity analysis converge, but when they are directly entered into the input for recalculation, convergence is no longer achieved. What’s going on? Additionally, a side-stream extraction was simulated; the purity of the heavy components at the bottom of the tower met the requirements, but actual re-vaporization was needed. I would like to use side-stream extraction from the bottom of the tower as a substitute for re-vaporizing the product from that area. A distributor is placed beneath the packing at the very bottom of the tower, and liquid-phase side-stream extraction is carried out through this distributor. Are the components obtained through this side-stream extraction identical to those at the bottom of the tower?
Reply #22015-09-10
Pressure swing distillation of acetonitrile-water – learn about it!
Reply #32015-09-11
It’s sufficient for the distillate at the top of the tower to have a composition close to the azeotropic one; there’s no need to define D/F
Reply #42015-09-11
In ASPEN’s settings, there is no parameter for the composition at the top of the tower; only parameters such as the flow rate at the top of the tower, the flow rate at the bottom of the tower, D/F, and B/F are available. So how can we achieve a top-of-tower product composition that is close to the azeotropic composition?
Reply #52015-09-11
Pressure swing distillation of acetonitrile-water – learn about it!
Reply #62015-09-15
It is sufficient to directly define the reflux ratio and the top draw ratio (or top draw amount); these ratios can be optimized by defining design variables. The purity of the acetonitrile side-stream extract may not meet the requirements.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.