Thread Content
May I ask, how many people are there for one position? Moderator @leisure929 said they have started working, but it seems there are few people there. I haven’t complained yet. We have fewer people. We have a plant with a capacity of 90,000 tons per year for MTBE and 40,000 tons per year for 1-butene. There are 4 teams in total, with 3 people in each team, covering both internal and external tasks. There is a technician and an equipment operator. This is our entire configuration. From equipment installation, the three inspections and four determinations, purging, airtightness testing, replacement, to the initial startup – all of this is accomplished with just such a small team. Of course, experts were invited to start the work. There are personnel with instruments and equipment for maintenance. Normal operations and emergency handling are the responsibility of the three of us. The steam was shut off several times, and there were multiple failures of the pumps. With someone on leave, it’s just the two of us working. One cannot provide assistance with internal operations; only an external operator is available to handle various situations. We’ve said we’re tired! For similar actual devices, the setup involves 3 operators inside + 3 operators outside + 1 team leader + 1 material handler, a total of 8 people; we handle it with just 3 people. After more than 2 years of operation, we have gotten through it smoothly. We can! ! Who doesn’t mind having fewer people? The salary remains the same; it wasn’t tripled. ========================================= Well, enough complaining. I have a question: how many people are there for each position? Do you think there are enough staff for the positions?
Go ask your boss for a raise; P, it’s not the same industry, so there’s no comparison
That’s because you have compressible space. If you stubbornly say you can’t do it, will they still fire you?
You’re right; when the staffing levels were set, it was said that the salaries would be high – initially, it was 8,000+ per month for two months. Now, the salaries keep getting reduced!
That’s how leaders are; they want to squeeze every last drop from you. I used to work quickly and responsibly, but now that I think about it, it wasn’t that interesting after all; it was good enough. Time’s up; whether the task is completed or not, there are those who are more anxious than us.
The hard work back then. The result was: It seems you can still handle it. Is that stupid?
Diesel modification, three people, working both internally and externally. Refinery: 500 managers, 500 workers. Fortunately, the equipment has a high degree of automation, so in case of an emergency shutdown, there is chaos and a shortage of staff.
Two field workers; if one takes leave, there’s only one left – that’s a bit too harsh. One internal operator, two external operators, one standby member, and one team leader – this configuration is fairly acceptable.
It’s just as bitter.:victory::victory::victory::victory:
This is the key point: an internal operator cannot provide assistance; only an external operator can handle various situations. -----There are safety hazards; the outdoor operation should be carried out by two people, with supervision
According to the operating procedures, outdoor operations must be supervised. If one person is working and something unexpected happens and they fall, no one will know. However, our inspection device is GPS-enabled. An alarm will be triggered if there is a 15-minute delay.