HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Process comparison between coal tar fluidized-bed hydrogenation and fixed-bed hydrogenation

2015-11-26View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by liuquan1100 on 2017-12-29 at 14:21. The raw material is the full distillate of medium- and low-temperature coal tar; the plant’s processing capacity is 100,000 tons per year. The operating pressure of the hydrogenation system is 16.6 MPa (G), in order to meet the product quality requirements specified by China’s National V standards for gasoline and diesel products as mandated nationwide in 2016. Based on its previous experience in processing coal tar, Shanghai Xinyou Energy Technology Co., Ltd. knows that coal tar has a high density, a high C/H ratio, as well as high levels of sulfur, nitrogen, and resinous asphaltenes; these properties make it easy for the material to cause coking, thereby blocking equipment and pipelines, and thus making its processing difficult. To this end, two processing options are provided for comparison. (1) Option 1: Fixed-bed hydrogenation process. Key points of this option: Coal tar is separated from coal tar pitch, and then the mixture undergoes two stages of hydrogenation – refining and hydrocracking – to produce high-grade refined oil products. A hydrogen production plant with a capacity of 10,000 Nm3/h is provided. For coal tar hydrogenation units, the most mature process currently in use is the one that involves \"atmospheric and vacuum pretreatment + hydrogenation refining + hydrocracking of residual oil\". First, the asphalt, solid impurities, and moisture that are not suitable for processing in fixed-bed hydrogenation are removed, after which the residual oil at 350°C is sent to the hydrocracking system. The fraction with a temperature >350°C, after hydrogenation refining, enters the hydrocracking system, where large molecules are opened and cracked into smaller molecules (naphtha, diesel fractions). The products of this cracking reaction are sent to a product distillation column for separation. In this process, the selectivity of the catalyst must not only enable the ring-opening and cracking of polycyclic and fused-ring hydrocarbons but also ensure a low amount of side chains in the products; this is achieved by controlling the yield of C1–C4 components to no more than 4%. Additionally, the ratio of naphtha to diesel products should be 3:7, with the dew point of the diesel products being below -20°C. If too many side chains of the oil are broken during the open-loop cracking process, it not only affects the overall yield of the products but also undermines the advantage of diesel products having a low freezing point. Additionally, hydrogen consumption increases, which in turn impacts the economic viability of the entire project. Plan 1: Material Balance Table
Item, Material Name, Weight%, Kilograms/hour, 10,000 tons/year, Remarks
Input: Coal tar – 100, 12,500, 10, 8,000 hours; Hydrogen – 7, 875, 0.6, 10,000 Nm3/h; DMDS – 0.4, 50, 0.04; Sulfurizing agent. Total – 107.4, 13,425, 10.64
Output: H2S+NH3 – 1.34, 167.50, 0.134; Dry gas – 2.46, 307.50, 0.246; Naphtha – 18, 2,250.0, 1.80; Diesel – 59.87, 7,483.75, 5.987; Water – 5.49, 686.25, 0.549; Residual oil – 0.24, 30.00, 0.024; Coal tar pitch – 20, 2,500, 2.0. Total – 107.40, 13,425, 10.74
Under this plan, all quality indicators of the refined products are high; the yield of refined products is slightly low. A small amount of residual oil (heavy marine fuel oil) is discharged, along with asphalt as a by-product. Diesel products are high-grade finished goods with low freezing points and low sulfur and nitrogen content, and they command high prices in the market. (II) Option 2: Fluidized bed + fixed bed hydrogenation process. Key points: The entire fraction of coal tar is fed into the fluidized bed hydrogenation unit; the gasoline fractions produced are sent to the fixed bed hydrogenation unit for further refinement, while the heavier fractions are subjected to both hydrogenation and cracking processes to produce finished products. This plan is accompanied by a hydrogen production plant with a capacity of 13,000 Nm3/h. The asphaltene content in the full distillate of coal tar can reach around 50%, and with traditional processing methods, the liquid yield is only 76%. By using the fluidized bed processing technology of Shanghai Xinyou Energy Technology Co., Ltd. to lighten the gum and asphaltenes in coal tar, the liquid yield of the product can be increased to 90%~95%. After hydroprocessing of the full fraction of coal tar in a fluidized-bed hydrogenation reactor, more than 85% of the S, N, O, and metal components are removed, while the degree of lightening of the resinous and asphaltenic components exceeds 90%. The gasoline fraction obtained after reaction separation is fed into a fixed-bed refining hydrogenation reactor, where the S, N, O, and metal components in the fraction are effectively removed; at the same time, the olefins, dienes, and aromatics are saturated, resulting in naphtha components that meet the required standards. The heavy fractions produced by the fluidized bed are first filtered and pressurized before being fed into a fixed-bed refining + cracking reactor, where they undergo hydrocracking to break down larger molecules into smaller ones (naphtha, diesel fractions). After the cracking reaction, the resulting products are sent to a product distillation column for separation. In this process, the selectivity of the catalyst must not only enable the ring-opening and cracking of polycyclic and fused-ring hydrocarbons but also ensure a low amount of side chains in the products; this is achieved by controlling the yield of C1–C4 components to no more than 4%. Additionally, the ratio of naphtha to diesel products should be 3:8, with the dew point of the diesel product being below -20°C. If too many side chains of the oil are broken during the open-loop cracking process, it not only affects the overall yield of the products but also undermines the advantage of diesel products having a low freezing point. Additionally, hydrogen consumption increases, which in turn impacts the economic viability of the entire project. Material balance table for Option 2
Item, Material name, Weight%, Kilograms/hour, 10,000 tons/year, Remarks
Input: Coal tar – 100, 12,500, 10, 8,000 hours; Hydrogen – 9, 1,125, 0.9, 13,000 Nm3/h; DMDS – 0.3, 37.5, 0.03; Sulfurizing agent. Total – 109.3, 13,662.5, 10.93
Output: H2S+NH3 – 1.37, 171.25, 0.137; Dry gas – 5, 625.00, 0.50; Naphtha – 25.38, 3,172.5, 2.538; Diesel – 69.19, 8,468.75, 6.919; Water – 6.86, 857.5, 0.686; Residual oil – 1.5, 187.5, 0.15; Heavy marine fuel oil. Total – 109.3, 13,662.5, 10.93
The total investment for Option 1 is 308.99 million yuan, of which 305.7 million yuan is allocated to construction costs. The total investment for Option 2 is 291.7 million yuan, with 288.22 million yuan going towards construction costs.
Comparison of the options: Both options meet the requirements for project approval. However, Option 2 has advantages over Option 1, specifically: 1. It utilizes fluidized bed technology, which is a more advanced process that effectively addresses issues related to heat extraction, temperature elevation, and coking ; 2. Higher raw material conversion rate, converting coal tar pitch into high-quality, high-value gasoline and diesel ; 3. Ensure long-term continuous operation of the hydrogenation unit (more than 2 years for fluidized-bed hydrogenation, and 8–10 months for fixed-bed hydrogenation), reducing operational complexity and minimizing investment requirements ; 4. The catalyst is regenerated online, eliminating the need for shutdowns for loading and unloading, which facilitates stable, continuous, and efficient operation of the plant ; 5. It offers better economic benefits, simultaneously greatly improving the processing capacity of the device, resulting in even more significant potential advantages. The 150,000 tons/year fluidized-bed tar hydrogenation industrial plant was successfully commissioned in Huanghua, Hebei in August 2015, with the process operational and achieving ideal results.
Reply #22015-11-27
Is your company planning to install a coal tar fluidized bed hydrogenation unit?
Reply #32015-11-27
Chifeng Boyuan has reached full production capacity, and the fixed-bed operation is performing well
Reply #42015-12-01
I have doubts about the 76% yield of Xinyou’s coal tar hydrogenation technology (fixed-bed). So this is the plan that was prepared for our project; according to investigations, the actual implementation rate is only around 60%, which is a significant difference.
Reply #52015-12-01
What is the hydrogenation conversion rate in a fluidized bed? What is the catalyst consumption? What is the price of catalysts for fluidized beds? And what is their service life?
Reply #62015-12-09
The conversion rate of gums and asphalts in fluidized-bed hydrogenation is over 90-95%. Taking a plant with a capacity of 150,000 tons as an example, the total amount of catalyst used is 24 tons, of which 12 tons are used in operation and 12 tons are kept as reserves; 3% of this amount is replaced every 10 days (this ratio can be adjusted). The price of this catalyst is the same as that of catalysts used in fixed-bed systems, and its service life exceeds 2 years.
Reply #72015-12-11
3% is replaced every 10 days, which means it is replaced once a year. May I ask if the coal tar fed into your company’s fluidized bed is a full-range product or a fractionated oil? Are there fixed-bed hydrorefining and hydrocracking following that? What is the quality of the product that comes out of the fluidized bed? Thank you
Reply #82015-12-15
In a fluidized-bed hydrogenation process, full-range tar (including low-quality feedstocks such as medium-temperature, high-temperature tar, desulfurized tar, and catalytic cracking slurry) is used in fluidized-bed reactors to convert gelatinous asphaltenes, along with hydroprocessing functions such as desulfurization, denitration, and demetallization; followed by fixed-bed hydrocracking. Depending on the properties of the feedstock, one fixed-bed refining reactor may be used or no additional ones needed. The density of the hot high-cut oil is 937, while that of the hot low-cut oil is 883. Sulfur and nitrogen are removed to 90% levels; the raw material contains 16% gum and 4% asphaltenes. After hydroprocessing in a fluidized bed, the gum content drops to 0.6% and the asphaltenes content to 0.4%, after which the mixture proceeds to fixed-bed hydrocracking. (Next, I’ll share some plans for processing residue oil using a fluidized bed.)
Reply #92017-01-07
What about comparing it to a suspended bed? Is there an advantage?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.