How should designers deal with such reviewers?
Thread Content
For someone like me who has only been working for 2 years, the reviewer serves as a major source of knowledge. When reviewing drawings, the reviewer can only identify errors related to the font used, the placement of elements within the drawings, and layout issues; there are few other types of errors that can be detected. Many significant technical problems cannot be corrected at this stage, and such issues are only discovered after the actual manufacturing process is completed. This kind of situation has happened many times. If it were you, how would you avoid making mistakes?
Hehe, the review process can’t be like that; after all, a signature is still required. Don’t overthink it.
The current review process just involves signing
Reviewers are getting quite bold these days; they just take a casual look
I think this is something that should be emphasized in design and verification. I understand that review is meant to establish directions and determine principles at the technical level; if the review doesn’t yield a clear outcome, one should turn to the project design manager, the technical director, or the chief engineer.
You’ve come across counterfeit goods that are under review; there are quite a few such items in the process of being reviewed. But isn’t your company’s review process different? Is it that weak everywhere? You can ask other skilled people for advice, or even the workshop workers.
First of all, one should pay attention when designing it themselves; moreover, review is only meant to determine the general direction, and it doesn’t involve checking everything as carefully as proofreading does. If you have any questions, come and discuss them with them directly
It can only be said that the review process is irresponsible or the technology is inadequate
The approval process is very strict; your reviewers don’t want to guide you!