Thread Content
This post was last edited by Yan Xiangsi on 2015-12-30 at 14:07. During the coking process, the proportion of coal that is converted into coke is generally between 70% and 80%; this percentage is known as the coking rate or coke formation rate. Verbalmente, it doesn’t matter whether it is called focal length or focusing ratio, but in professional technical papers, should it be written as focal length or focusing ratio?
“It is an abbreviation for “coking rate of coke,” also known as “coke formation rate.” I think either one will do; those in this field can understand either. The paper is also written for people in this field
In support of this claim, the coking rate and the formation rate are the same thing; just as a plug is sometimes called a cock.
COKE YIELD: the yield of coke; personally, I think “conversion rate” is a more appropriate term! !
Does the term ‘coking rate’ or ‘coke formation rate’ refer to the metallurgical coking rate or the overall coking rate?
I checked the \"China Metallurgical Encyclopedia: Coking Industry\", and found the term \"coke formation rate\", but not the term \"coking degree\". This ratio should refer to the total focal length; it is a different concept from the metallurgical coking index
Here it should refer to full focus. The percentage of coal converted into coke is the conversion rate; coke chips and coke powder are also considered coke.