HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Case analysis: Should the following situation be classified as a work-related injury? (4)

2016-03-01View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by slll611 on 2016-3-8 at 20:45. Work-related injuries must be recognized by the human resources and social security authorities; only those confirmed to be work-related injuries entitle the individual to corresponding benefits. Therefore, the recognition of work-related injuries is crucial for employees. Due to the diversity and complexity of real life, many work-related injury cases with similar yet distinct characteristics have emerged in the practice of determining such injuries. To this end, several such cases will be selected for discussion below to help establish a clear definition of work-related injuries; the results will be announced in one week. Everyone is welcome to participate in the debate; all participants will receive a reward, with extra prizes for those who can offer unique perspectives and detailed explanations. @zxz017 @LVZBMAN @hnan @wamj6566@*anpangpang @hanyu*a8 @No Regrets @Storage and Transportation Torch @Guan Gongyu @yu3606 @*aojiaoya0546 @Fish in the Desert @B0SS @Linlin Shangshang @Sulfur-Zinc-Aluminum @Ice Age Snow Tracing @soul_BOY_young @zxj5048386 @Liu Fei @Revisiting the Three Kingdoms liu Case: Liu is an employee in a clothing sales department; his daily tasks include handling clothing sales as well as taking materials to the relevant locations for modifications. On December 2, 2012, she was involved in a traffic accident while delivering materials to the processing facility, which resulted in an injury to her left foot and a fracture of the left tibial plateau. Mr. Liu applied for recognition of his work-related injury, and the human resources and social security department accepted the application and issued a decision regarding the work-related injury. However, the company claims that Liu’s injury resulted from his leaving the workplace without permission, which constitutes a violation of the employer’s rules. Delivering materials to the processing site on his own did not fall within the scope of Liu’s duties, and by violating the employer’s relevant regulations, the injury he suffered cannot be considered an occupational injury. You are a judge; how do you make a decision? Don’t forget to reply after voting, otherwise you won’t get the reward. For evaluation criteria, refer to: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1556795-1-1.html
Reply #22016-03-01
Liu is an employee at a clothing sales department; his daily duties include handling clothing sales as well as taking the materials from customers to the modification site for adjustments. On December 2, 2012, she was involved in a traffic accident while delivering materials to the processing facility, which resulted in an injury to her left foot and a fracture of the left tibial plateau. I believe that a workplace includes not only the place where employees carry out their daily work but also the areas they must pass through when traveling between different workplaces. The location where salesperson Liu was involved in the traffic accident is a route he must take as part of his work, and should be considered a reasonable extension of Liu’s workplace, falling within the scope of the workplace.
Reply #32016-03-01
First, determine whether it is regular working hours; second, check whether the location of the traffic accident is on the necessary route for delivering clothing (or one of the necessary routes). If both conditions are met, it is definitely considered a work-related injury.
Reply #42016-03-01
It must be a work-related injury. As mentioned earlier, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security has already made a decision. As for the subsequent internal company operations, assessments can be carried out based on management requirements
Reply #52016-03-01
It falls under work-related injuries. It is part of the duties of the person who sees off guests to make the necessary modifications; this responsibility cannot be disregarded just because they are injured.
Reply #62016-03-01
It was Liu’s regular task to deliver materials to the modification site for adjustments, and any injuries he sustained while performing this work should be considered work-related injuries.
Reply #72016-03-01
If an accident occurs during working hours or on the way to work, it should be considered a work-related injury

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.