Thread Content
I’m seeking advice from experts: The company is working on an LNG storage tank, and the choice of design has not yet been finalized. We are inclined to use a bimetallic full-volume tank, but it is said that the currently being built bimetallic full-volume tanks violate certain regulations. Could you please let me know exactly which aspects violate these regulations?
I was still wondering about this when, that morning, the boss (who isn’t familiar with the equipment) asked me to check what aspects of the construction of the bimetallic full-volume tank violated the relevant specifications He doesn’t even know which design institute to go to to listen to people’s nonsense, which really confuses me
Many manufacturers are doing it, and I haven’t heard of any issues with violations of regulations...
I’m wondering if he went to several design firms; some of those firms were unable to do this work, so they just told him nonsense. Dear expert, do you have any information regarding bimetallic full-volume tanks that you could send to me for reference? My email address is junshao31@163.com. Thank you very much!
Sorry, I pressed the wrong button. The email address is junshao31@163.com. Thank you!
Could you be more specific? It’s impossible to give you all the information, right?
I also want to compare the differences between bimetallic full-pressure tanks and prestressed concrete full-pressure tanks. Could you send some relevant materials? My email: thesmallfrey@163.com
For example, the problems related to hydrostatic testing are difficult to resolve at present, as there is a discrepancy between the standards and actual practices.
In fact, everyone has a different understanding of the concept of a full-volume tank. Does anyone nowadays dare to include the full specifications in the design documents for double-walled tanks? Except for companies that are willing to provide lightning protection, right?
Hello! Could you send me one? Thank you very much. Email: 1143726158@qq.com