HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Problems in coal quality analysis

2016-03-22View Original

Thread Content

I noticed that the coal quality analysis reports mention infrared and coulombic methods for determining the sulfur content in coal, but the data obtained from these methods differ significantly! I would like to ask everyone about the differences between these two analysis methods? In actual calculations, which method’s data is used as the basis for the computation?
Reply #22016-03-29
The Coulomb method should be accurate, while the infrared method is indirect but relatively fast. The Coulomb method involves directly burning sulfur to produce sulfur dioxide and then conducting measurements.
Reply #32016-03-29
Are the results of the two testing methods significantly different?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.