Why do some container interfaces have different sizes
Thread Content
This post was last edited by Little Worker on 2016-3-24 at 16:55. As the title suggests, there are many container interfaces on the PID with oversized headers. Why not simply create a small nozzle or a large nozzle that matches the pipe diameter? To reduce the flow rate? Or? Generally, for imports, the pipe diameter is small while the pipe opening is large; for exports, the pipe opening is small while the pipe diameter is large. What is the principle behind this?
You’re only mentioning part of it. This is a comprehensive consideration. Flow rate is one factor; there are many others as well, such as reaction rate, cost, safety, quality, and so on
Some devices are fixed in design, and there’s nothing that can be done about it. The equipment designed by oneself generally has a large capacity, which facilitates future expansion. Additionally, the preparation of requirements for the equipment, the creation of design drawings, and manufacturing take place early on (during the manufacturing phase); some adjustments may be made during the detailed design stage. At this point, it may no longer be possible to adjust the nozzle; only the piping can be adjusted.
In other words, it’s because of the design itself, and it wasn’t done intentionally for reasons such as flow rate or anything else, right?
In my opinion, importing is done to save costs, as long as the flow rate is not exceeded
In my opinion, importing is done to save costs, as long as the flow rate is not exceeded
In my opinion, importing is done to save costs, as long as the flow rate is not exceeded
In my opinion, importing is done to save costs, as long as the flow rate is not exceeded
In my opinion, importing is done to save costs, as long as the flow rate is not exceeded
How exactly should it be said? How to save costs