Thread Content
Thus, the most intense gas emission occurs in the first separator, and as a result, the highest amount of carryover (NGLs and heavier hydrocarbons) occurs in the off-gases (in absolute terms). Therefore, the objective of this study was to reduce the intensity of gas emission at the early stages of separation through simulation. This is a paper on improving the efficiency of oil and gas separation. I’m not sure if “most intense carry-over” refers to “residual reconstituted components”; also, how should “intensity” be translated? Dear forum members, please use your academic and work experience to help explain this. Thank you all!
““Most intense carry-over” refers to the “reconstituted residue,” which is the liquid phase that comes out of the bottom of the first separator; after pressure reduction, it becomes off gases. This also aligns with the fact that the most intense gas emission occurs in the first separator. “Reduce the intensity” refers to the process mentioned in the previous sentence, namely the reduction of the content of heavy components. “Intensity” can be understood as the content of heavy components, or it could be loosely translated as the \"heaviness\" of the gas; no more suitable term comes to mind for now
This post was last edited by bamboobamboo on 2016-4-8 00:38. Thus, the most intense gas emission occurs in the first separator; as a result, the largest amount of carry-over (NGLs and heavier hydrocarbons) ends up in the off-gases (in terms of absolute values). Therefore, the objective of this study was to reduce the intensity of gas emission during the initial stages of separation through simulation. In other words, the majority of gas volatilization takes place in the first separator, which leads to a significant amount of NGLs and heavy hydrocarbons remaining in the off-gases. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to reduce the density of residues in the early stages of oil and gas separation through simulation methods.
Thank you for your approval! ! Also, I think it’s feasible for the reply below yours to translate “intensity” as “density”
Thank you for the translation. I also think it’s a very feasible choice to translate “intensity” as “density.” Thank you so much!
The meaning is definitely fine, but after checking, it seems that the term \"density\" isn’t used; translating it this way might confuse readers. It’s better to use a free translation – as long as the meaning is clear
It seems to be the case; maybe translating it in a professional article would not be very useful, haha