Thread Content
What did everyone think of the practical questions from yesterday afternoon? Anyway, I feel like there’s quite a tight schedule, and there are also many topics covered in the exam
There are many knowledge points, the exam questions are rather unconventional, and there is a lot of calculation involved
Both the practical aspects and evaluation of the building coefficient and floor area ratio were covered in the exam. I can’t do any of it. . .
Yes, we need to hurry and restore it; otherwise, it will be too late by then
I seem to have gotten the unit for the last question in the session on consultation methods and practices yesterday afternoon wrong – it’s completely wrong.
Do everyone still remember what the last question was? Is it economically viable or not?
The correct answer is that it is economically unviable. The environmental loss is counted as a cost of 40 million per year; however, the figures in the table are given in millions, so the environmental loss is converted to 40 million per year, after which the economic net present value is calculated
The building coefficient and floor area ratio are basic technical criteria for comparison
The building coefficient and floor area ratio are basic technical criteria for comparison
The building coefficient and floor area ratio are basic technical criteria for comparison; their calculation is relatively simple, compared to indicators such as investment intensity and land use efficiency. However, the most complex financial and economic calculations related to these criteria are often of poor quality, full of pitfalls, and prone to ambiguity in interpretation