Thread Content
What desulfurization technology is suitable for S Zorb flue gas? How to handle it most economically?
By simply understanding the process of the sulfur recovery hydrogenation reactor, we achieved results that were surprisingly good.
Integrated into a sulfur recovery unit, or integrated into catalytic flue gas desulfurization
Does Yu Gong have any relevant data or materials? We originally had this process in the design phase here, but it was removed during implementation! The main concern is the large fluctuations in the operation of the hydrogenation section. . . . .
Our sulfur production capacity is less than 15,000 tons per year, we have S-ZORB with a processing capacity of 1 million tons per year; the total sulfur content in gasoline ranges from 450 to 600 ppm, and the temperature rise in the hydrogenation reactor is generally only 45°C.
Have you compared the changes in emissions before and after? Given the significant impact of the nitrides and moisture in the S-ZORB exhaust gas on the hydrogenation reaction, we ultimately integrated this stream into the catalytic flue gas desulfurization system!
We did the same thing – we integrated the Szorb flue gas into our catalytic flue gas desulfurization process. If it really works as Director Yu said, the results are surprisingly good; I share your concerns as well.
The operating load of our equipment is low, offering greater flexibility in exhaust gas treatment; there is no significant difference in flue gas quality control. However, a detailed comparison regarding the proportion of amine solution circulation volume has not been conducted.
Are there any other issues with catalytic flue gas desulfurization? Does the quality of the exhaust gas and the quality of the wastewater have an impact?
That’s exactly what we do here!
Which factory do you guys work for? Were any problems encountered during operation?