HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Regarding ‘illegal content’ in historical posts”

2016-06-17View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by Thank goodness you're here on 2016-6-17 at 15:27. While working on a post, I had a slight misunderstanding with the original poster; I’m posting here to invite everyone to discuss it. The post titled “Prohibited Content: Do Not Violate the Rules” issued by the forum was published on June 25, 2015 (see the attached document for details). So, what should be done regarding the violations mentioned in historical posts prior to the issuance of this regulation? Perform content editing, or leave it as is. @413343962 @guanjian88 @*lihuagong @boyirensheng @zhangqi1234 @cleaner @Fish_in_the_desert API 620-2012 - Powered by Discuz! http://bbs.hcbbs.com/forum.php?m ... &page=1#pid15944758 Prohibited content; do not violate regulations - Powered by Discuz! http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1410146-1-1.html
Reply #22016-06-17
Those copyrighted materials that were published in the standard version were all hidden by me under the old man’s guidance; ordinary people can’t see them
Reply #32016-06-17
I find that those who leave contact information such as phone numbers or QQ IDs have their posts edited; those who just post nonsense messages have their points deducted
Reply #42016-06-17
It can even be hidden, good.
Reply #52016-06-17
Historical posts, not newly posted ones. It’s a historical post, right? No points will be deducted, right?
Reply #62016-06-17
The standard version has an archive area that is not visible to non-administrators
Reply #72016-06-17
Oh, if I had known this, I would have moved them all here.
Reply #82016-06-17
It’s just a simple watering sticker; it replies with a bunch of randomly typed characters or letters
Reply #92016-06-17
Any violations discovered now, whether historical or not, are handled one by one (handling: deletion, editing). Things like violation records and bans should be used on a case-by-case basis; it’s not possible to make generalizations.
Reply #102016-06-17
That’s how I usually handle it: I edit what can be edited, and for what cannot be edited, I simply delete it, without it being recorded as a violation.
Reply #112016-06-17
Let’s not get entangled in historical issues; no extra points will be given as encouragement

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.