Feeling something about a certain situation; an atmosphere of disharmony is spreading, and even academic forums are not spared—To members, “Beng Zhou” ”

Thread Content

One day, while reading a post, I saw someone talking about matters related to work: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1272815-1-1.html. I myself am also interested in such topics. As an ordinary designer, when I see people expressing dissatisfaction with the “designer” community, I naturally share my own opinions as well. I’ve always adhered to the principle of focusing on matters rather than people. My professional competence is decent; I work diligently and cautiously, fearing to make any mistakes. And then, well... I ended up in that situation. It is an undeniable fact that designers, due to a lack of understanding of production, cause various problems. Some of the issues raised in the main post are not actually due to design, while others are indeed caused by design, as analyzed by others later on. It is speculated that they posted the message because they felt the design was extremely poor, and thus expressed their feelings; although in reality some of those issues were misunderstandings. It’s okay if there are misunderstandings; what matters is good communication, and that’s also the purpose of forums. But for some people, communication is nothing more than blame – a shortsighted form of blame that doesn’t allow anyone to say \"no\". A group; it’s not one person. It is a weakness of human nature to try to punish an entire group based on the actions of one or a few individuals. On the Internet, it’s common to see people saying that the people from certain places are bad; I believe that many people in those places are innocent victims of such accusations. Here, “xx place” is replaced with “design”. I saw someone say to me, “Then you can start a new job – either don’t do the work at all, or do it well. In doing work, one should act with integrity; don’t try to exploit clients by claiming the payment isn’t enough or starve your colleagues.” I got quite angry, so I posted this thread. Thank you for trying to teach me how to be a person, but no thanks, I don’t need you to teach me! ! ! I consider my personality to be independent, my attitude to be proper, my approach to tasks to be thorough, and my demeanor to be enthusiastic; I strive for objectivity and fairness. I was just analyzing certain devices and situations, and yet it was applied directly to me? ? I also object to the idea that \"the money given isn’t enough to ruin homeowners and starve competitors,\" but please, is it really unreasonable to turn around and blame me? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The successful implementation of a project is the result of collaborative efforts from various parties. Mistakes can occur in design, during construction, by supervisors, and even by the project owner. If one party makes a mistake and someone from another party detects it and addresses it promptly, many problems can be avoided; this is what I consider to be an ideal approach. For example, during the design phase, it is advisable for the client to be as involved as possible; this may cause some designers discomfort, but it can effectively reduce changes later on. For example: For a certain project, a 3D model review was scheduled; however, the client was too busy and canceled it. During on-site construction, it was considered that the position of the safety valve for the pipeline leading from the top of the tower was too high, and it was requested to be lowered. Later, it took the teams specializing in pipelines, stress, structures, and other aspects a long time to resolve the issue. At this point, someone from the client’s side can say that this is due to design reasons. The designers are also uncomfortable; if it’s brought up during the design phase, there’s no need for all this back-and-forth. As for whether it’s really too high, there are various opinions on this; ultimately, it depends on the client’s requirements. If a 3D model review is carried out as planned, such issues can be avoided, preventing changes on site. Making mistakes isn’t scary; the earlier they’re detected, the fewer the side effects. Meaningless accusations are poison.