Thread Content
I’m seeking proper diagrams of pipe supports. Hello, experts! I am a chemical pipeline design technician with a degree in environmental engineering. I work for a small environmental engineering company, where my main task is handling pipeline layout. Since I can’t afford PLANT 3D software that includes standard databases, I use CAD 2007 to create drawings. The axonometric and plan views I produce are not professional at all. In particular, I’m not sure about the proper format for drawing pipe supports; I’ve looked up relevant information, with some suggesting a plan view of the pipe supports along with a table detailing them, while others recommend indicating the model, location, and quantity of the pipe supports in the axonometric views. Therefore, I’d like to get diagrams of pipes and pipe supports created by a professional design firm so that I can learn from them. Thank you!
The original HG pipe rack standards from the Ministry of Chemical Industry can also be used. The design institute also made some modifications based on HG
Check the chemical industry standards; it’s HG21627, if I remember correctly~
Hey, I didn’t expect to actually have forgotten it; as one gets older, the mind doesn’t work as well~
It’s necessary to read the main text carefully. Although the title says it’s a request for “support diagram templates,” what’s actually being asked is the method of creating such diagrams, rather than standards for supports. Axonometric drawings and plan views correspond to each other; once the drawings are prepared, the location and type of supports should be indicated on them. There should also be a separate \"list of supports and hangers\" or summary table. If there are any special supports, drawings specific to those supports are required as well.
We need to indicate the tray numbers and their approximate locations on the piping layout diagram, and then prepare a tray table that specifies which type according to HG/T21629-1999 should be used for each numbered tray. Unfortunately, in practice we worked in a rather rough manner, relying on estimates rather than precise calculations; on-site, we simply placed the trays wherever it seemed appropriate. . . .