HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The impact of ASPEN’s process type setting on the results

2016-10-26View Original

Thread Content

Newbie’s guide: For the first example in the textbook, which simulates the reaction between benzene and propylene, after entering the data as specified in the example, the simulation results are different; even the set feed rate changes. After checking the reason twice, it was found that the process type setting in the global settings was different—one was set to \"common\" and the other to \"ALL\", and this led to significant differences in the results. What is the difference between these two settings?
Reply #22016-10-26
This has no impact on simulation. \"All\" displays all property methods in the property dropdown list (base method), while \"Common\" shows the frequently used property methods, which is intended to make it easier for you to select methods from the base method. The different results you obtained on two occasions are likely due to the change in process type, which caused the properties of the base method to change

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.