I would like to ask whether the structure on the pipeline in the figure is reasonable.
Thread Content
This post was last edited by Clever Xiaoming on 2016-12-19 at 13:35. As shown in the diagram, it is a pipe where section b is DN15, while ports e and f are both DN10. Since there is no standard variant of DN15×10, it is being considered to simply make holes in the DN15 pipe. Is this a reasonable approach? Additionally, is there a reasonable way to provide support for ports e and f?
Damn, I sent the wrong picture. . . I’m sorry
Young man, what have you revealed? Stockings, cough cough
It depends on where it is used; after all, similar approaches can be seen on-site.
There are many ways to create openings on site, and not all of them involve using reducers. Look at the physical properties of the medium and the pipeline grade. Pipelines that are not under special pressure or do not contain flammable or explosive materials do not need to be inspected as thoroughly.
This post was last edited by Clever Xiaoming on 2016-12-19 at 13:38. OK! Port e is the pressure gauge port, while port f is the sampling port, which is connected to the outlet pipeline of the equipment
It’s unreasonable. It cannot be processed during actual manufacturing. They can be connected to each other using a DN20 tee. When connecting to F/E, just weld it directly.
The tube is too small; it’s difficult to make a hole in it...
If it is not a special pipeline or medium, this approach can be used, and there are examples of its installation on-site.
If the pipe is too small, there’s no problem making a hole; just use a welded tee.