Thread Content
As the title suggests, I would appreciate some advice from experts
There are too many key points, so I’ll just mention the review objectives: 60% – Ensure that the major changes made since the 30% review still meet the project requirements; ensure that the changes comply with basic safety principles; confirm that the nozzle orientation and platform setup satisfy the operational/maintenance requirements; inspect the areas where valves and instruments are operated; identify improvements, especially those related to safety and operability; conduct a building review; check whether the equipment is easily accessible; is the design safe? Does the design achieve the intended purpose?
90%: – Ensure that the changes made since the 60% review meet the project requirements; – Ensure that the areas where changes have been made are accessible and operable; – All issues identified during the 60% review have been resolved. That’s roughly it; the aspects related to meeting these objectives are what are of key importance
90%: – Ensure that the changes made since the 60% review meet the project requirements; – Ensure that the areas where changes have been made are accessible and operable; – All issues identified during the 60% review have been resolved. That’s roughly it; the aspects related to meeting these objectives are what are of key importance
Design institutes have their own model review regulations. It’s stated in the rules.