Thread Content
Dear experts, may I ask whether an explosion-proof plate, which is one of the safety accessories in pressure vessels, can be replaced by a safety valve? Are there any relevant design requirements or guidelines?
Personally, I think it shouldn’t be possible; the levels should be different, right?
Although they are both safety pressure relief accessories, they are used in different scenarios! It mainly depends on your medium and its sensitivity to pressure!
This post was last edited by bfdlwolf on 2019-2-26 08:13. It’s not allowed. According to Appendix B of GB150.1-2011
It seems to be mainly related to the medium, temperature, and things like that; the issue of replacement also needs to be taken into account
For rupture discs, it actually depends mainly on the application scenario and cost, etc.; they are suitable for most applications
This is not possible; the practical applications are different.
1. Safety valve: 1.1. Suitable for media that are non-viscous and free of solid particles. 1.2. Cannot be used alone in situations where pressure increases rapidly, nor in situations where the sealing surfaces may be clogged by the medium or where crystals may form within the medium. 2. Burst disc: 2.1. Suitable for situations where pressure increases rapidly. 2.2. Used in series to protect the performance of the safety valve. 2.3. Cannot be used alone when dealing with highly toxic, extremely hazardous, or explosive media, as well as liquefied petroleum gas. By understanding the different application ranges of these two devices, it is possible to determine whether they can be used interchangeably
No, most burst discs need to be connected in series in front of the safety valve to assist it