HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Seeking advice on flange selection

2020-05-09View Original

Thread Content

Hello, fellow sailors! I have a question: Are there any regulations specifying a minimum pressure rating requirement for the flanges on pipelines carrying flammable and toxic gases (with high toxicity)? (I have seen that the current regulations require a minimum pressure of PN20 for Class A1 fluids, while no such requirement exists for Class A2 fluids. The toxic and flammable gases used in our company are highly hazardous; the operating pressure is 0.13 MPa. Can flanges with PN10 rating be used?) I’ve heard from some designers that for flange seals involving flammable and toxic gases, a flat surface cannot be used; at least an RF surface or a better sealing design is required. But in SH3059, I only found the regulations regarding the inability to use plate-type butt weld flanges; I didn’t find any regulations concerning the requirements for the sealing surfaces. I was wondering whether what the designer said is correct, or if I just haven’t found the relevant specifications Thank you!
Reply #22020-05-09
Is HG20592 not used in the chemical industry for RF surfaces?
Reply #32020-05-09
There is a detailed explanation on the selection of flanges in the section on flanges in hg20583.
Reply #42020-05-10
It seems the teacher above didn’t explain my question; I hope fellow netizens can help answer it. HG20583 refers to the vessel flange
Reply #52020-05-10
Refer to Sections 7.2.4 and 7.2.3 of HG/T20583-2011.
Reply #62020-05-10
That’s a good question. I’ve been using 20592 and 20615 for a long time; I really didn’t pay attention to the scope of application for the FF surface. I just checked the fifth edition of the Chemical Process Design Manual, and there was no information regarding the selection of FF surfaces there: L
Reply #72020-05-10
PL FF PN10 is suitable for DN10~600, but the maximum pressure rating for PL FF is PN16. In cases where the substances are highly toxic or extremely toxic, a higher grade is chosen for design purposes; therefore, FF is generally not used
Reply #82020-05-11
When it’s safe, consider the cost!
Reply #92020-05-11
Firstly, an operating pressure of 0.13 MPa is not high; choosing a higher pressure level is simply more secure. As for the sealing surface, an RF surface will suffice, while for flange types, WN is appropriate.
Reply #102020-05-12
This post was last edited by *nht1 on 2020-5-12 09:38: WN, RF, or FM/M – at least PN25 is required

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.