Is it necessary to make the DN50 steam pipeline in a π shape?
Thread Content
This post was last edited by bulusli on 2022-5-27 at 14:12. Is it necessary to make the DN50 steam pipeline in a π shape, given that its length is over 100 meters? Those with needs for pipeline stress analysis can contact a Class A design institute, which can provide calculation reports. wei r1600843384. Stress analysis report templates and various design templates are available for sale.
It is necessary to review the compensation stress calculation sheet.
If it’s a straight line of 100m, it needs to be done; roughly 50m per section. At that time, if there are many bends in the middle, it will be necessary to calculate and determine that
It’s best to create a stress model and calculate the results. It’s just over 100 meters, so taking a π turn will be much safer
A straight line cannot truly be straight; if π is not allowed, it can only remain in a bow-shaped form.
Check temperature and pressure; low pressure is not necessary; extend the pipe support
The pressure isn’t high; just buy two expansion joints and install them
No compensation stress calculation was performed; a manual calculation showed that compensation was still absorbed
Is it necessary to make a bend in such a small tube? I saw before that they were all made of large pipes
Is it more troublesome to use expansion joints than to rely on natural compensation?
If it were a straight segment of 100 plus or minus some meters, a π-shaped bend would definitely be necessary. If there are L-shaped sections or height differences, etc., by installing fixed, guiding, and sliding supports in appropriate locations, it isn’t necessarily necessary to use a π-shaped bend