The issue of valve selection
Thread Content
Having come into contact with some organizations that use valves, there are certain behaviors that confuse me greatly. It’s clear that the existing valves do not perform well, and they especially cause problems in production processes. Yet the management refuses to approve the replacement with better products, mostly due to cost considerations. In fact, the stable and continuous production that good valves enable generates greater economic benefits than the extra cost of purchasing them. We welcome fellow enthusiasts to actively participate in the discussion.
Hehe, if you had the power to make purchasing decisions, you’d know that it’s not necessarily a matter of cost-effectiveness; there are other factors as well that you’re not aware of. Take your time to understand it: lol
It seems a bit complicated; it’s quite difficult. I’ve also heard some opinions on it
The previous batch of valves was decided to be purchased by a certain leader. Thinking of changing brands after just a few years – that won’t work; it’s a complete disappointment. . . . . . In fact, many companies are for the above reasons. . . .
The most direct reason is that by continuing to use the old valves, it’s possible to not notice any leaks; whereas with new valves, even the slightest problem means that procurement will be held accountable~
This way, procurement won’t be held accountable; procurement is only responsible for obtaining the lowest price. The one who bears the responsibility is the person who first suggested changing the manufacturer or type of valve. And leaders will never be the first to step forward.
They are all valve manufacturers, so it’s that simple to replace them; however, there are many interests involved