Discussion on the merger of soda ash and chemical fertilizer sectors
Thread Content
According to management needs, the forum management has merged the fertilizer section from coal coking with the soda ash section of the industry region. However, it seems that there are still some problems and there are many opinions on whether the two sections should be merged. Features seek your opinions and vote. @Li’s little brother@cleaner@江北肖@mkp369 @OK @xuqinger @1573 @zuo923
Soda ash fertilizer moderators, please give me more opinions. It has been half a month since the merger. How is the effect? Can it meet expectations? Please give me more opinions.
Chemical fertilizers and soda ash are similar but also very different； In view of the fact that the quantity and quality of long-term management in the Fertilizer District cannot improve, and moderators cannot be recruited, the forum needs to increase its management strength. It should be said that the merger is beneficial from a management perspective. ； The disadvantage is that managers and readers will see a lot of content that is irrelevant to them when flipping through posts. However, the industry is still being consolidated and institutions are being reorganized. From a phased perspective, this approach is worth promoting, otherwise it will be a stagnant mess. In the long run, when the sub-section management is on the right track, professional division of labor can be carried out according to requirements.
There is not much connection between chemical fertilizer and soda ash, right? Why merge? It would be good to put chemical fertilizers in the industry area.
According to the development needs of the forum, division and merger are not important! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
It is inappropriate to separate soda ash from the industry, and it is even more inappropriate to merge coal-based fertilizers with coal-based fertilizers. By then, coal-based fertilizers and synthetic ammonia will be too closely related, wouldn’t it be better to merge? @654262293 @zhangqi1234
Don't be confused about mergers and divisions. There are two main lines for dividing forum sections, one is professional and the other is industry. There are many chemical industries that are not on the list.
From the perspective of forum management, if long-term participation is low and there is no good way to increase participation, it can be merged with similar majors. At the same time, publicity work must be done to let everyone know where to find it and how to find it. Later, when the participation level is high, partitioning will be carried out when necessary. These are flexible, subject to the development needs of the forum. If everyone participates in a forum for a long time, the number of posts will be very small and there will be no need to exist. The main thing is to do a good job in preliminary publicity.
In fact, this is not only true from the perspective of the forum, but also the soda ash industry. The prosperity of an industry is closely related to the market. Objectively speaking, the soda ash industry has begun to decline. Regardless of whether it should be independent professionally, the result is that long-term participation is low, and there is no good way to increase participation, and it eventually merges with similar majors. So I chose indifferent.
This post was last edited by mkp369 on 2015-3-7 16:58 It has been some time since the soda ash section and chemical fertilizers were merged into i Coalization. I believe some friends have seen the effect. The soda ash section is indeed not as popular as before. As mentioned by the previous few, it has a lot to do with the market, but is the soda ash section the coldest and least popular? I feel that after the merger, the soda ash section may reach the coldest and lowest level.
If the organization is reorganized, will we blame others? Or regroup? I think most people still hope to develop in a good direction. How to develop: It is unrealistic to expect others. Under the existing facts, participate more, discuss more, share more, and post more meaningful posts. In particular, managers have become more involved. If we encourage some people to participate and take some incentive measures, I think things will get better.