Is it better to read as many books on sulfuric acid as possible?
Thread Content
Whenever I visit sulfuric acid plants, I often encounter friends asking me to recommend books on tools related to sulfuric acid, and I also see requests for help in this section frequently. I remember when I was at the factory, my supervisor (who was also a manager) once told me something like this: It’s not true that the more detailed the operating procedures are, the better. Some people can recite them by heart, but their actual skills don’t improve, and following those procedures mechanically can even lead to accidents. Think about the period of the Chinese revolution: there were many theoretical experts (such as Wang Ming) who caused setbacks for the Chinese revolution at that time. In my opinion, to master the use of sulfuric acid, one needs a solid theoretical foundation, as well as the ability to apply that knowledge flexibly in practice. It’s not true that the more books on sulfuric acid one reads, the better.
This post was last edited by in the blink of an eye on 2018-7-7 at 22:30. It is recommended that those interested first carry out the material balance for each step in the sulfuric acid production process, and only then proceed with the heat balance if conditions permit.
Master, how is the catalyst loading for each section of the converter determined? The plans provided by manufacturers are usually based on empirical values, and such experience seems rather unconvincing
Knowledge should be applied practically; don’t just study mechanically. Baidu knows everything, but what can you actually solve with it?
This is a systems engineering issue that involves catalyst activity and kinetic equations. If the catalyst screening of the existing device needs to be replaced, I can give you some advice