HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Dilution of concentrated sulfuric acid

2021-04-09View Original

Thread Content

When diluting 98% sulfuric acid to around 50%, at a rate of 2 tons per hour, should an enamel-lined reactor or a graphite diluter be used? ? Their respective advantages, disadvantages, and precautions. Please let me know
Reply #22021-04-12
The dilution of sulfuric acid is exothermic; diluting it to 50% concentration releases approximately 45 KJ/mol of heat. Regarding sulfuric acid: 1. Corrosion resistance – if no cooling is used, the maximum temperature during dilution and mixing is 100 degrees, so either material should work fine. 2. Cooling area – the reaction vessel only has a jacket; is an additional heat exchanger needed, perhaps one made of graphite? 3. Price comparison
Reply #32021-06-15
Cooling is necessary. Is the 98% acid produced internally or purchased externally? If it’s purchased, a low-concentration version can be chosen; using enamel-lined tanks will result in lower costs, and a 5-cubic-meter enamel-lined tank will suffice for dilution
Reply #42021-06-15
The things to note are the order of addition, as well as diluting a portion first to lower the temperature before use. Diluted with dilute acid and 98 acid; it should be 983
Reply #52024-08-22
Enameled tanks or steel tanks lined with acid-resistant tiles can be used, but a heat exchanger and a cooling water system are required.
Reply #62024-09-02
If 2 tons are diluted per hour, ice-based dilution can be used, utilizing the phase change heat of ice to absorb the heat required for diluting sulfuric acid. Using an enamel container would be better; it’s inexpensive and corrosion-resistant.
Reply #72024-09-14
This post was last edited by heart_qcssu on 2024-9-14 at 11:34. It is recommended to use silicon carbide coolers; concentrated sulfuric acid and water are mixed and fed into these coolers, with circulating water serving as the cooling medium. This setup allows for continuous operation and high processing capacity, whereas reaction vessels can only operate intermittently, with poor dilution capabilities
Reply #82024-09-20
It is best not to use jackets on reaction vessels, mainly due to the risk of magnetic explosion; jackets can be considered only when the temperature difference is small. Using an external graphite heat exchanger is the best option, as it also ensures continuous operation. In this way, the concentration can be kept stable.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.