Solved
Thread Content
This post was last edited by Jiaozi666666 on 2023-11-13 at 14:25; the issue has been resolved
One can first use theoretical formulas for calculation, and then verify it through practice; generally, there will be errors!
This post was last edited by Jiaozi666666 on 2023-11-13 at 14:28
I’m a bit dizzy. Read the gauge reading on the title carefully. That data is a gauge reading; the gauge is fixed on the pump along with the motor
This post was last edited by Jiaozi666666 on 2023-11-13 at 14:28
Machine pump mechanics on Earth generally use another formula. Based on the principle of similar triangles, the front foot length is calculated as (S1–S3) / (the ratio of the distance from the front foot to the gauge point to the diameter of the opposite wheel) + radial gauge reading / 2. The back foot length is calculated as (S1–S3) / (the ratio of the distance from the back foot to the gauge point to the diameter of the opposite wheel) + radial gauge reading / 2. I’m already working on advanced-level calculation problems; it’s not for getting an advanced qualification, but rather for competitions. P;P
This post was last edited by Dumplings 666666 on 2023-11-13 at 14:27, 11 times
This post was last edited by Dumplings 666666 on 2023-11-13 at 14:27, 11 times
The dial indicator pointer is on the motor coupling; these two instruments are mounted on the same frame and used to turn the shaft synchronously. Our facility doesn’t have such equipment, but you can find information about it online. Actually, by making proper markings and rotating the disc twice, it is also possible to measure the radial and axial values separately, with the same results. There is another example in the question bank, where the dial indicator pointer points at the pump coupling; you can compare it and take a look