HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The relationship between the stirring hole of the glass-lined reactor, the mechanical seal, and the stirrer blade

2020-08-24View Original

Thread Content

1. Our factory usually purchases KGR8000 reaction vessels, all of which have shaft diameters of 110 for the agitators. The agitator hole on the reaction vessel that arrived this time is DN150 – will there be any problems if we use a 110 diameter shaft? Are there any standards or recommended values for this? 2 The swaging flange for current reaction kettles is in accordance with HG/T2105-2001; we purchased the mechanical seals from Zhejiang Lantian – how should this be aligned with the standard? There are many codes like 69, 79, 91 – how should they be matched?
Reply #22020-08-24
HT/T2105-2001 should be related to G/T25092
Reply #32020-08-26
For standard reactor lids with capacities of 4000L to 8000L, the diameter of the stirring holes is 150; you can check the information provided by the reactor manufacturers
Reply #42020-08-26
For mechanical seals, just provide the reactor model and stirring diameter to the manufacturer
Reply #52020-08-26
Specializing in the purchase and sale of used reaction vessels, dryers, chemical equipment, and pharmaceutical equipment
Reply #62020-08-27
The stirring installation holes of the reaction kettle are all standard, and mechanical seals are generally selected according to the volume of the reaction kettle. As for the loop flanges, they generally comply with the standards HG/T25092 and 93. As for Standards 69, 79, 92, and 93, they are standards that emerged during the development of glass-lined reaction vessels. 69 and 79 are now rarely used; it’s just that the diameter and height of the reaction vessels differ. The main change in the current Model 93 and Model 79 is that the holes on the reactor lid have been changed from diagonal to straight. It’s just that there are slight differences in the standards regarding the configuration of the reducer and its frame.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.