HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Is a design signature required for the substitute materials of pressure components in atmospheric-pressure vessels?

2017-02-06View Original

Thread Content

Section 2.13, \"Material Substitution\", of TSG R0004-1009 \"Regulations for Fixed-Volume Vessels\" stipulates that any substitution of materials for the main pressure-bearing components requires written approval from the design unit. Section 2.1.5, \"Material Substitution\", of TSG 21-2016 \"Regulations for Large-Volume Vessels\" states that substituting materials for pressure-bearing components also requires written approval from the original design unit. Then, is approval from the original design unit necessary for substituting materials for the main pressure-bearing components as well as ordinary pressure-bearing components in atmospheric-pressure vessels?
Reply #22017-02-06
In a pressure vessel at normal pressure, there is no such thing as primary pressure-bearing components and ordinary pressure-bearing components. . .
Reply #32017-02-06
Main pressure-bearing components and general pressure-bearing components of atmospheric-pressure vessels? I don’t understand! :lol
Reply #42017-02-06
This post was last edited by Teisei on 2017-2-6 at 22:48. Normal pressure is not within the scope of regulation by the Special Equipment Safety Law; anything not explicitly stipulated by law is allowed. Therefore, don’t start with those two documents you mentioned – instead, check whether there are any requirements related to safety standardization
Reply #52017-02-07
In a pressure vessel at normal pressure, there is no such thing as primary pressure-bearing components and ordinary pressure-bearing components.
Reply #62017-02-07
There’s definitely no need for it; there are no security risks.
Reply #72017-02-07
Is borrowing that compressed element requires design approval? Even without distinguishing between primary stressed elements and general stressed elements
Reply #82017-02-07
The key issue is whether a design signature is required for its substitute materials
Reply #92017-02-07
The key issue is whether a design signature is required for substituting a stressed component
Reply #102017-02-07
Since the regulations do not specify this, it depends on what is stated in your organization’s quality assurance system documents; just follow those guidelines

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.