HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Flammable liquid storage tank

2017-03-15View Original

Thread Content

I want to design an atmospheric-pressure storage tank with a capacity of 100 cubic meters for flammable liquid (dichloroethane). Is it necessary to use a tank equipped with a head? Can’t it be flat? If a head must be used, is it better to design it as vertical or horizontal? Is it easy to transport such a large, eye-catching device?
Reply #22017-03-15
For a pressure vessel with a capacity of 100 cubic meters for storing flammable liquid (dichloroethane) at atmospheric pressure, it is not necessary to choose one with a head. Flat-top ones are also okay, but they are not easy to transport. It is recommended to design it as a horizontal type with a head, as it is easier to transport than a vertical type. . .
Reply #32017-03-15
In favor of a 100 cubic meter horizontal tank with a head
Reply #42017-03-15
These atmospheric pressure tanks must be fabricated on-site, as there is no need for transportation.
Reply #52017-03-15
It is usually fabricated and installed on-site; a melon-rind panel with a diameter of 5 meters and a height of 6 meters is suitable, though the specific requirements depend on the location on site. A pressure resistance of around 6 mm at normal pressure is sufficient.
Reply #62017-03-16
Both vertical and horizontal types are available. Vertical stations take up less space, while horizontal ones require more space; however, the horizontal type is generally chosen as it is easier to operate. Choose a cover for easy transportation
Reply #72017-03-16
A flat top is acceptable, but since it is at atmospheric pressure and the plate thickness is relatively thin, I think reinforcement bars made of angle steel or channel steel should be installed on the flat top.
Reply #82017-03-16
From a production cost perspective, it is more reasonable to design it with a flat base and a conical top; transporting 100 cubic meters should not be a problem
Reply #92017-03-16
With such large transportation constraints, there are many limitations: L
Reply #102017-03-16
Unless the work is done on-site, vertical cone-shaped items generally cannot be transported, as they are too tall and wide, resulting in high transportation costs
Reply #112017-03-16
100 cubic meters isn’t large; it’s better to design it as a horizontal type for easier transportation. If it must be vertical, a conical top is recommended.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.