Comparison of hot-rolled, explosive, and composite panels
Thread Content
Hot-rolled, explosive, composite plate comparison: 1. Methods: Explosive bonding, rolling bonding. 2. Standards: NB-T 47002.1 and 47002.4-2009 for explosively welded composite plates used in pressure vessels; YBT 4282-2012 for hot-rolled stainless steel composite plates used in pressure vessels. 3. Advantages and disadvantages: Explosive bonding: Simple process and flexible production, but high technical requirements and difficulty in achieving precise control; the composite interface consists of a direct bonding zone, a melted layer, and vortices. Due to atomic diffusion at the interface, severe plastic deformation occurred in the joint region accompanied by work hardening. The joint surface has a wavy structure, which is beneficial for improving the bonding strength and tensile strength. Rolling: High production efficiency, zero emissions and zero pollution; the layer thickness can be as low as 0.1 mm, with good surface quality and high adhesion strength. 4. Please add to and improve this by thinking about it: What are the reasons why explosive clad plates are widely used in China?
Our unit has a disulfide separation tank that uses composite panels. :lol
We have used both methods we designed.
Currently, pressure vessels use explosively formed composite panels.
Who has used the rolled composite sheets for pressure vessels at Taiyuan Iron and Steel Company?