Thread Content
Letter from the Special Equipment Bureau of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine on soliciting opinions on the "Special Equipment Production Administrative Licensing Catalog (Draft for Comments)" (Quality Inspection Special Letter [2017] No. 47) Quality and Technical Supervision Bureaus (Market Supervision and Management Departments) of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government: In order to implement the spirit of the "Top-level Design Plan for the Reform of Special Equipment Safety Supervision", strengthen the safety supervision of special equipment, and promote the reform of administrative licensing, our bureau organized the drafting of the "Administrative Licensing Catalog for Special Equipment Production (Draft for Comments)", which is now issued to you. Please organize relevant units to discuss it seriously as soon as possible, and feedback your opinions and suggestions to our bureau in writing before August 31, 2017. Contact person: Kang Haoyuan ; Telephone: 010-82262253 ; fax: 010-82260187. appendix: "Special Equipment Production Administrative Licensing Catalog (Draft for Comments)" Special Equipment Bureau of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, July 28, 2017
Haha, literally speaking, the design still needs to be licensed. After all, there are still only a few pressure vessels designed and manufactured by oneself.
This post was last edited by SDHZZXM on 2017-8-2 12:01 When a pressure vessel manufacturing company designs the pressure vessels manufactured by the company, if it does not need to obtain a design license, does its design reviewer need to obtain it?* * Approval personnel qualification certificate issued by the Standardization Committee?
It is said that the detailed terms have not been released yet. Let’s wait and see. It’s another storm.
Give you a link http://www.aqsiq.gov.cn/xxgk_13386/tzdt/gzdt/201707/t20170731_494265.htm
Judging from the draft for comments, after the design, there are only two categories: "Rules" and "Analysis", not A\D\C and other categories. The review and approval will be done by* * After the bureau took control, the original localized management of Class D was cancelled. Manufacturers can design and manufacture their own containers. But I think there are several factors to consider: 1. There needs to be a legal explanation, that is, the Special Equipment Law, pressure vessel and pressure piping design licensing rules and other regulations need to be changed. 2. How to ensure the design quality after the design is not classified? After all, different types of equipment design require different knowledge. 3. * * Does the Quality Inspection Bureau have the energy to manage design across the country? 4. As an equipment approval personnel, if the registration system is implemented in the future, you can serve various manufacturing plants without being limited to the unit on the certificate. This will make it easier for the approving staff to work part-time!
Let's wait and see, I don't know what it will look like in the end.
Regardless of whether you need a permit or not, those who sign on the drawings must be responsible.
It is estimated that the manufacturing qualification covers the design qualification. For purely design-oriented design institutes, engineering companies must also obtain qualifications. Auditors still need to obtain evidence before they can take up their posts.
Take it out of context and understand it one-sidedly: victory: