HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Qualification issues for outsourcing non-primary stressed components

2017-09-18View Original

Thread Content

There is no doubt that the main stressed components must be manufactured externally by qualified manufacturers. But for non-primary pressure components, if the cutting is done by an external supplier, is it required that the manufacturer have qualifications for handling pressure vessels? How does everyone proceed?
Reply #22017-09-18
No specific qualifications are required, but our factory, in accordance with the quality assurance system for pressure vessel manufacturing, also controls the material and quality of non-primary pressure-bearing components, primarily based on the product process sheets.
Reply #32017-09-18
For non-primary pressure components, if the cutting is carried out by an external supplier, it is not necessary for that supplier to have qualifications as a pressure vessel manufacturer; however, certain technical requirements must be met...
Reply #42017-09-18
Are there any relevant standards in place? Is this defined by the system files themselves?
Reply #52017-09-18
This post was last edited by SDHZZXM on 2017-9-18 at 12:06. How can we make generalizations? It depends on what kind of non-compressed component it is... For example, code for fixed containers has relevant regulations regarding the materials used in pressure vessels...
Reply #62017-09-18
It only involves material cutting, shaping, etc., without welding involved, and no qualification requirements are needed.
Reply #72017-09-18
Compare several options, select a manufacturer, and invest in developing them properly.
Reply #82017-09-19
This post was last edited by Pinocchio on 2017-9-19 08:17. Where manufacturing supervision and inspection are required, the manufacturing unit must possess the appropriate manufacturing qualifications. According to ASME Code Section 6.1.2.1(3), tube sections, heads, and shell plates that are manufactured separately and have welds, or heat exchange tube bundles joined by welding methods, require manufacturing inspection. In practical operations, a more conservative approach should be adopted; for the manufacturing of any pressure-bearing components that require welding, it is necessary to ensure that the subcontracting factory possesses the appropriate manufacturing qualifications. Under normal circumstances, welding is not outsourced. If there is no welding, the outsourced manufacturing unit does not require a pressure vessel manufacturing certificate.
Reply #92017-09-20
It is recommended to require subcontractors to have a track record of supplying under similar conditions
Reply #102017-09-22
Such questions prompt him to search on Baidu for what steel is

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.