HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Regarding the classification of containers

2017-10-31View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by hebeizhengyuan on 2017-10-31 17:01. We have recently designed a pressure vessel; its structure is shown in the attached diagram. The tube side contains high-pressure gas with a design pressure of 31.4 MPa; the maximum inner diameter of the header tubes is 140 mm, while the shell side is filled with steam. In accordance with the requirements of Code 1.3, the PV value for the shell side, as determined from the tables, classifies the vessel as a Class I vessel. The tube side falls outside the scope of Code 1.3 because the maximum diameter of the header tubes is less than 150 mm (the tubes are of DN25 size); therefore it is classified as not falling into any specific category. As a result, the entire equipment is classified as a Class I vessel. During the manufacturing process, the inspectors from the local inspection department said that our classification was incorrect; it should be classified as a Class III container. Their reasoning was as follows: First, this equipment falls under the regulations regarding classification. Since it is governed by those regulations, the tubes and shell sides are classified separately based on various PV values, and the overall classification of the container is determined by the higher category among those of the tubes and shell sides. This equipment has a tube side volume of 400 liters and a pressure of 31.4 MPa; it uses the first type of medium, and the entire equipment should be classified as a Class III vessel. Due to disagreements, the inspection personnel refused to inspect this equipment. Colleagues, are their opinions correct? How do you classify such containers?
Reply #22017-10-31
This post was last edited by hebeizhengyuan on 2017-10-31 at 17:02. The image wasn’t uploaded; it’s being added now
Reply #32017-10-31
The inner diameter of the tube side is 140 mm, and it falls outside the scope of application of the fixed volume regulations; this equipment has been classified as belonging to the steam side, and therefore should be classified as Category I
Reply #42017-10-31
A diameter of <150 is used to determine whether it falls within the 150 standard range; there are three criteria for compliance: the medium, pressure, volume, or the product of pressure and volume. It should be A1, high-voltage category 3
Reply #52017-10-31
The 2009 version of the regulations removed the requirement regarding inner diameter from the 1999 version, but the new version of these regulations, TSG 21-2016, reintroduced such a requirement
Reply #62017-10-31
The mechanism of this device mentioned by the poster seems to be the use of high-pressure gas inside the tubes to heat the water in the shell side, thereby generating steam, right? Is it a bit similar to the principle of a waste heat boiler?
Reply #72017-10-31
According to the classification in TSG 21-2016, it should be Category I; I’m waiting for the opinions of other maritime professionals:victory:

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.