Thread Content
It’s been 10 years now, and I don’t know what to do – should I continue producing or switch to something new?
? The service life isn’t a reason for scrapping it either, right? Was the regular inspection not done? Check the rating level
If it exceeds its service life, the inspection frequency needs to be increased accordingly. According to calculations by the finance department, it is more cost-effective to dispose of it and replace it with a new one at the end of its lifespan.
Look at the results of the regular inspection; there are suggestions included. Just implement it as suggested.
Conduct regular inspection grading in accordance with Part 8 of the Large Vessels Code. Just as people can’t be buried alive as soon as they reach a certain age.
Isn’t it 20 years if not specified? Has it become 10 years?
Containers designed according to the old capacity regulations shall be handled in accordance with those old regulations. After passing the regular inspection, it should be allowed for use. It’s not allowed; go to the Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau’s website to ask for an authoritative answer.
The design service life is merely an expected lifespan proposed by the designer based on the design conditions, and it is not the actual service life of the container. Necessary measures should be taken after the design service life has expired. The container in question does not specify a design service life according to the original regulations; therefore, whether it can continue to be used after ten years of use depends on the results of inspections carried out during its operation. The safety status of the container is determined through regular inspections, which also help determine the interval between subsequent inspections. Based on this interval, economic considerations can be taken into account to decide whether it is appropriate to continue using the container or to have it replaced.
Check the rating on the inspection report from the special inspection agency