Input of effective thickness at the small end of the equipment flange neck
Thread Content
I have a question for everyone: when calculating the flange of a computing device, should the effective thickness of the smaller end of the neck be entered as 22 or 14 in the diagram?
I’m sorry, I can’t add the image
The effective thickness is the thickness after removing the corrosion allowance; take a look at the definition of effective thickness yourself.
It is estimated that the 22 mentioned by the poster refers to the thickness of the flange neck, while 14 refers to the thickness of the cylinder that connects to the flange. This seems a bit controversial; to be cautious, let’s say 14 losses
It is entered based on the thickness of the connecting cylinder.
Select Advanced Mode in the upper right corner of the posting dialog box to upload photos.
I think, based on the thickness of the joint cylinder and taking into account the definition of effective thickness, the corrosion allowance should be deducted; what needs to be entered actually is the thickness of the joint minus the corrosion allowance